Letting it all hang out, sideways sort of
We live today
in a tell—all—let—everything—hang—out society, a society that believes that
keeping certain things to oneself is psychologically unsound for the individual
and for society as well, and therefore the best thing to do when confronted
with personal matters you would rather not discuss with anyone is,
counterintuitively enough, to discuss then with damn near everyone you can
think of. I should blame Sigmund Freud for this, but I don’t, not really. He
merely theorized that discussing your innermost thoughts and emotions with a
medical professional would help his patients understand why they were so
miserable; he never promised anyone that spilling their guts to him would make
them permanently happy—it would only relieve the misery of existence for a
short time, in much the same way as a priest granting absolution after a
sinner’s confession understands that the sinner will need to come back and get
relief for the sins he will commit during the following week. It may not make
you happy, but you will know why you’re not happy.
No, I blame
Phil Donahue and his principal acolyte, Oprah Winfrey, for the current
obsession with knowing more about people that we really care to know, and, of
course, I blame Philo Farnsworth for inventing television in the first place,
which gave Donahue and Winfrey the platform they needed to display their
emotional basket cases to an unsuspecting world. I suppose, given the
popularity of the format that Donahue and Winfrey pioneered, that I am in a
minority about this, but I would just as soon not know who is copulating with
whom or to discuss reproductive biology, my own or someone else’s, with complete
strangers. I do not inflict unwanted confidences on other people and I should
like some reciprocation from them, but I know better than to expect it. I
realize that this reluctance is an anachronism in this day and age, a cultural
artifact of an Irish Catholic childhood that has no place in the modern world,
but there’s nothing I can do about it at this point. I am what I am, said
Popeye the Sailor Man, and if it’s good enough for Popeye, it’s good enough for
me.
I wonder when
we here in this our Great Republic began treating the most intimate aspects of
our private lives as fodder for mass entertainment and the stuff of everyday
conversation. You may not credit this, but once upon a time here in this our Great Republic
the only people who would talk about such things in public were the mentally
ill. But the mentally ill have a reason for their tell-all mania: they are, in
fact, maniacal. They are nuts, clinically, psychologically, one hundred percent
by a doctor who went to medical school and everything certified bonkers. The
rest of us, however, don’t have that excuse. So why do we keep displaying our
psychic quirks in public? The question
remains a Rosicrucian mystery to me and all the evidence points to the question
staying that way. I suppose people keep doing this sort of thing because emotional
caterwauling makes them happy and it makes other people happy to watch them roll
around in their psychic traumas. There is something more than a little gruesome
about all of this, I think, but as I appear to be the only one who thinks so, I
must endure what I cannot stop. It all seems horribly unfair to me, but I don’t
think anyone cares what I think of all this one way or the other. Ah well, what
can you do?
Labels: bad weather, baked goods, Oprah, Phil Donahue, popular culture, psychology, reproductive biology, Roberta Vasquez, television, yellow cling peaches in heavy syrup
