Disinvitation and the expanding intestine
Yes, it is
that time of the year again and hence something of a silly season here in this
our Great Republic, where the lengthening days and abundant sunshine turn many
a soon to graduate college senior’s mind to thoughts of how they’re going to
pay off the mountain of debt they’ve managed to wrack up with a bachelor’s
degree in Queer Vegan Studies. It’s a
puzzlement to me too, to paraphrase Yul Brynner in The King and I, but one that will not prevent our graduate to be
one last radical hurrah before they go out into the workaday world and sell out
to The Man. So, yes, it is that time of year again, the time wherein the
disgruntled, the disaffected, and the more than usually dysfunctional student
and all of his or her ilk goes forth and denounces the commencement speaker and
demands that he, she, it, or they slink away in shame.
The
commencement speaker, for those of you have managed to skip the whole college
experience, is a distinguished person brought in by the college to give a
speech to the assembled graduates. The speech is usually long and tedious and
often tendentious as well, and as filled with untruths as a politician’s
campaign speech. Knowing this, I skipped the speech and the graduation itself
when I got my bachelor’s; I went to see Field
of Dreams instead. But when I got my master’s I had to go; my mother made
me. She wanted to be proud of her oldest boy and she wanted to see me get the
piece of paper that would entitle me to a permanent position in the civil
service, so I had to go. It was, as I anticipated, a fairly gruesome
experience, although not as bad as a poke in the eye with a sharp stick. The
dean of the college gave the commencement, and while the speech was too damn
long, he did end it with some pithy remarks and a good joke, so all was not
lost. My brother, on the other hand, spent much of the speech slouching lower
and lower in his chair, the better to see the valedictorian’s legs, which were,
I have to admit, very nice, but there is a time and a place for everything and
that was neither the time or the place.
I bring
this largely unnecessary family history up because the august institution that
granted me my master’s degree has succumbed to the madness of campus
commencement disinvitation syndrome. A former
student of said august institution—not me, unfortunately, because I’d give the
grads an earful—is returning to deliver the commencement address and the campus
radicals are already busy at work trying to get the man disinvited. The
would-be speaker, an immigrant from a war-torn Third World
country where large numbers of the populace believe that sheep are an
acceptable alternative to having a date on Saturday night, made a fortune
selling yogurt through hard work, living right, and sheer business acumen. This
in itself would render the man unacceptable to the fevered minions of the neo-Marxist
anti-capitalist left, who infest the groves of American academia like Dutch elm
disease, as well as to the more radical African-American activist groups, who
consider all such tales of immigrant success as examples of racial oppression
and a testament to the power of whiteness in a Jim Crow society. But the
loudest shrieks against our prospective speaker came from the radically lactose
intolerant, who have made it clear to anyone who will listen that they regard
our speaker as a vicious poisoner on a par with Lucrezia Borgia in the bad old
days before she became a feminist icon.
Now, you
must understand that when I first heard this I thought it was a joke. I have
seen a lot of peculiar things in my life, from the re-election of the former
junior senator from Illinois to learning that there may be as many different
genders in this world as Heinz has varieties of ketchup, but I must admit that
the idea of a genetic inability to digest dairy products could be the basis of
a political movement had never occurred to me. Peculiar or not, however, it is
so, and therefore the television stations here in the Vampire State are showing
the demonstrations against our commencement speaker on almost every broadcast.
From a
purely objective point of view, I will grant that there may be something to the
complaints of the lactose intolerant community. Seeing your alma mater honor a
man you regard as hateful does not do much to improve the climate of inclusion
that all institutions of higher learning here in this our Great Republic do
their utmost to foster nowadays. That being said, there is a point when the
propaganda of the deed makes the propagandist look foolish, as when the lactose
intolerant threaten to go to the commencement speech after eating the speaker’s
product and turn the venue into a vile and noisome hellhole of reeking
flatulence. Lactose intolerance does reduce the quality of one’s life, I’m
sure; it can’t be easy growing up and having Mom tell you that you can’t have
the ice cream the rest of the kids are eating because it will give you a bad tummy
ache, but these dolts are now making themselves look ridiculous. I realize that
they will call me insensitive, which I can live with—my mother calls me worse
things every time I see her—but they will always call anyone they disagree with
something. This is one of the reasons
that our campus comrades love speech codes so much—Alinsky was right: ridicule
is a powerful weapon, but only if you’re not the target. If you are the target,
if you can tell the people telling you that you’re dumber than a box of rocks
to shut up, then by definition you can’t be ridiculous. Remember, Winston, two and two are five, if
the Party says so.
Of course,
all of this controversy has horrified and appalled our commencement speaker, as
well as the president of the university, who thought that he’s hit the jackpot
with our speaker; after all, is there a less controversial subject in this
world than yogurt? Who could object to
yogurt? Now that he’s knows, the papers
say that he may disinvite the speaker, since there are rumors floating around
that the lactose intolerant activists may occupy the main administration building
and burn it down if the president doesn’t meet their demands. As a concerned alumnus, I think I should
offer what seems to me a perfectly workable solution to the problem: let the
speaker speak and tell the lactose intolerant to avoid his product. Eating the
man’s yogurt is not a requirement for graduation nor is it a violation of
anyone’s constitutional rights. He’s not
making the stuff to damage anyone’s sense of self-esteem nor is the dairy
industry engaged in a vast conspiracy to make the lactose intolerant feel bad
about themselves. Commencement is about
finally leaving school and entering the adult world. It is not nor has it ever
been about anyone’s gastrointestinal problems.
As this is a practical solution to this alleged problem, I fear, it will
not happen and I suspect that those lactose intolerant radicals who like to
foam at the mouth about their genetic oppression will have none of it. My second suggestion is to call in the state
police and have them teargas the campus thoroughly and then crack some skulls.
Frankly, I don’t think that’s not going too happen either. Universities don’t do that sort of thing
anymore, which is a pity, I think. Sometimes you really do have to pound some
common sense into some people.
Labels: campus violence, commencement speeches, disinvitation, lactose intolerance, Roberta Vasquez, student protests, yogurt
1 Comments:
At 4:11 PM, Dick Stanley said…
My own commencement speaker, way back in 1967 before the groves became the home of the Left was one Spiro Agnew, the U being that of Maryland and he being the governor at the time. I have no recollection of anything he said but I was vaguely satisfied at his punishment when he was later forced to resign the vice presidency after disclosures of his having routinely entertained bagmen in the governor's mansion bringing his latest bribe. It was a lesson of sorts, beyond whatever he intended with his speech, I'm sure.
Post a Comment
<< Home