South of the Border
I don’t have much to say at the moment, but I thought I’d
say it anyway. We are much confused these days between legal immigrants and
undocumented immigrants, whom the press often refer to as undocumented workers,
and I thought I might be able to do something to explain the difference. The first category in the previous sentence
is an actual category of people living here in this our Great Republic. Those
people are individuals who obeyed American immigration law, applied to come to
the United States, and jumped through all the bureaucratic hoops the collective
Kafkaesque mind of the immigration bureaucracy could devise to come out on the
other side with a legal resident card, the legendary Green Card, which I
understand is actually a sort of off-peach color these days. They are, by
virtue of their obeying the law and acquiring the off-peach green card, allowed
to live and work in our country with all the rights and privileges of citizens
of the land. The only privilege not extended to these good folks is that of
suffrage, the franchise being limited to actual citizens and those who like KFC’s
chicken. This is one of the great mysteries of the modern world to me; I cannot
eat more than a few pieces of the Colonel’s cuisine without started to belch
uncontrollably. I think I am allergic to at least one of the eleven secret
spices in the original recipe.
On the other hand, the category of undocumented immigrant
(or worker) is a euphemism and I think I can say without too much controversy
that the point of a euphemism is to not call something by its right name
because its right name accurately describes the person or thing described and
that accurate description is, for one reason or another, uncomfortable or
inconvenient or politically incorrect. In this case, the politically incorrect
phrase we are looking for is illegal alien. This is a short phrase, but it
clearly shows that the person who bears the name is one, currently living and
working in the United States of America in violation of the laws governing
immigration to the United States of America, and two, a citizen of a country
that is not the United States of America.
Hence, illegal alien. That does not seem so hard to figure out, I think,
and when I am confused with the concept, a confusion progressives and
capitalists alike choose to foster for reasons both political and mercenary, I
simply remember that my mother and her brothers and their wives are legal
immigrants to the United States and that the guys who are mowing my neighbor’s
lawn as I write this probably are not. Now,
I am sure that the guys mowing the lawn next door are very nice people who want what’s
best for their families, but so were my paternal grandparents and my mom and
her brothers and their wives and they didn’t see the need to come into the
country illegally. What the guys next door mowing the lawn are, in short, line
jumpers, people who make the thousands patiently going through the process feel
as though they are idiots for showing up for interviews and filling out
questionnaires and doing the right thing when all they have to do is cut out
the middleman and get across the border one way or another. So why bother doing
the right thing?
The purpose of immigration law, as I understand it, is to give the federal
government a chance to look over the people who want to move here and determine
whether those people should move here. This
is not controversial: every country in the world, with the possible exception
of Germany these days, does the same thing.
There is no inherent right to enter and reside in the United States,
unless, of course, you are an American citizen or a legal resident. For all others, entry to this country is not a
human right, it is not a civil right, it is not a constitutional right, it is
not a natural right. Entry to this country is a privilege that the government
grants and that the government can withdraw at any time the government feels
necessary. A temporary visa is just
that: temporary. You get to come in, maybe study at an overpriced college that
will be more than happy to charge you twice what they are charging Americans,
or go take a look at the Empire State Building and the Grand Canyon, maybe
catch a bus tour of the stars’ homes in Hollywood, or hang out in the French
Quarter during Mardi Gras and grab some beads and flash your tits to the crowd down
on Bourbon Street. And then you go home. I fail to understand what is so
complicated about that, but then, I do not need cheap labor to line my pockets—I
can mow my own lawn, thank you very much—nor do I feel the need, in Brecht’s
catchy phrase, to dissolve the people and elect another in order to make sure I
can win elections. Asking that people
obey the law didn’t used to be a matter of such contention; that it is now
tells me that people want the law changed but know that such change is not
possible; the people who already live here, you see, get to have a say in such
matters, which seems to annoy a great many Masters of the Universe no end.
Labels: annoyances, cannibalism, Clan Bashmachkin, controversy, Emigration and immigration, illegal immigration, Red Sox, reform, Roberta Vasquez, the law